cognitive behavioral therapy

Therapist Claire Jack on Autism Spectrum Disorder

An Interview with Therapist Claire Jack

Claire Jack, Ph.D. is an Anthropologist and Therapist based in Scotland. Dr. Jack specializes in working with women with Autism Spectrum Disorder and has published “Women with Autism: Accepting and Embracing Autism Spectrum Disorder as You Move Towards an Authentic Life”.

Jennifer Ghahari:  Hey, thanks for joining us today for this installment of the Seattle Psychiatrist Interview Series. I'm Dr. Jennifer Ghahari, research director at Seattle Anxiety specialists. We are a Seattle-based psychiatry, psychology and psychotherapy practice specializing in anxiety disorders.

I'd like to welcome with us anthropologist and therapist, Claire Jack, who joins us from Scotland today. Dr. Jack received her Ph.D. in anthropology and has subsequently trained as a therapist over 10 years ago. In her late forties, she was diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder and has sought to help others understand more about this often challenging disorder. Before we get started today, can you let our listeners know a little bit more about you and what made you interested in becoming an anthropologist as well as a therapist?

Claire Jack:  Okay. Yeah, actually, I suppose for me the two things link up really quite a long time ago. When I was 18, I started to train as a psychologist, I started to do my degree in psychology. For various reasons, it just wasn't really the right course for me. I shifted to archeology, so I've had a long route to get here, which led on to anthropology and history because, obviously, anthropology and archeology are quite closely related. I think there was just always that interest in how people work, how they communicate, so very much was studying that within anthropology.

I really got into therapy from my own personal experience. I had a really bad driving phobia and I had had hypnotherapy a long time ago, which was reasonably successful, but not fully successful. I had an incredible hypnotherapy session for my driving phobia and that just made me want to train. I trained in that, I did counseling, I did life coaching. That's it, really, I've been working as a therapist now I think for probably nearly 15 years and I've had a training school for 10 years, so I combined the two.

Jennifer Ghahari:  Great. Can you explain to our listeners what autism spectrum disorder is?

Claire Jack:  Okay. Autism spectrum disorder is a developmental disorder, so that means that you're born with the condition. When we're thinking about it, we can really think about three levels of autism, we've got level one, level two, level three. I think it's really important to remember, it's a huge spectrum, so very big spectrum of experience.

People with level one autism, that's what I've been diagnosed with, that's equivalent to what used to be called Asperger's syndrome. I think in 2013, you no longer have an official diagnosis of Asperger's. That is roughly equivalent to level one autism. People with level one lead independent lives on the whole; average or above average intelligence. They have symptoms, I think it's important not to downplay how difficult level one autism is, but most people can lead a certain completely independent life.

Level two autism, we're talking about people that maybe need some kind of assistance, might struggle to be lead independent lives.

Level three is often associated with learning difficulties; it might include people who non-verbal.

It seems like it's such a big spectrum that you almost think what have people, say like me, who's leading a completely independent life, with someone who has special needs and a lot of help, what have we got in common? It's really thinking about the traits. People with autism, we have sensory issues, difficulties processing sensory stimuli, communication and social difficulties. We might have difficulties with restricted interests. Emotional regulation difficulties are really common as well. Across the spectrum, people have these traits that they share in common.

Actually, I don't have anything visual that I can show this on, but I think when we think of a spectrum, we often think of a linear spectrum, from good to bad or difficult to easy, but actually, if you think of it as a pie chart and think of the symptoms and think, well, somebody might be much more affected in terms of communication difficulties, but maybe less affected in terms of restricted interests, or they might have difficulties with eye contact, but less emotional regulation difficulties. Instead of thinking of it a spectrum, we can think that people have really diverse experiences within autism as a whole.

Jennifer Ghahari:  Wow, great. Thank you for explaining that and the different levels. Unfortunately, without more information known about autism among the general public, those without it can often feel frazzled or annoyed at some of the ways it may present in people. It's fairly common to hear notions like, "Why can't they stop doing that? Why don't they act normal?" Can you explain what it's actually like to experience autism? What does it feel like?

Claire Jack:  Yeah. I suppose, first of all, there's not a choice in it. You are experiencing the world differently and you're processing the world differently, so you can't think yourself out of autism. I think that's the first thing for other people to remember. Actually, although I'm autistic myself, I come into contact with autistic people and we don't all necessarily get on together, so I can see it from both sides. An example might be, I do a lot of teaching, I teach students, and sometimes my autistic students need me to really explain things in a huge amount of detail, I need to spend an awful lot more time going over things, they might take things that I say very literally so I have to go over that, and just I end up spending a lot more time with them. I can understand that they need that time, but I can see that that could be frustrating for somebody else.

Yeah, and to come back to your question, it's important to know that when something is happening for somebody autistic, it tends to be happening in a really extreme way and there is nothing that they can do about that. For instance, when I was a child, because I think a lot of people learn about autism because they've got maybe autistic children, when I was a child, I was very well behaved; never, ever misbehaved. That was what I wanted to be like, I just wanted to be a really well-behaved kid. But if I was triggered, I was a monster; absolutely, I was horrific.

One time in the hospital, I was there for an operation, I attacked all the nurses, I got all the medical equipment, I threw everything everywhere. I scratched my mum so badly that she still has the scars. I was five, but there was no controlling me. It wasn't a choice; I never would've attacked like that. I think that's just really important to think, because autistic people have to process things in a different way, you have to understand it is different. It's not the same, no matter how they might present most of the time to somebody.

Jennifer Ghahari:  Great. You mentioned triggers, could that be something like lights or smells or sounds?

Claire Jack:  Absolutely. I think when I'm thinking about triggers, I'm usually thinking about emotional triggers and sensory triggers. What you're talking about is more in terms of sensory processing. An example might be going to the supermarket and dumping your bags because you can't be there any longer, or a huge one for me is people scraping their plates. As a kid, I couldn't stand, especially if we had unglazed plates in the house, that noise, I just couldn't be in the room. Even as an adult, I've learned to cover it a bit, but that kind of thing, I experience it very, very deeply. It's like a physical, horrific pain. Both my sons have that sensory thing as well, they're exactly the same.

Emotional triggers can also be a huge thing as well. I think often, if you're not being understood or you're not being listened to, maybe somebody's given you too much information. I had a client recently, a student, and she was just getting too much information that she wasn't able to take in and had a complete meltdown. I think those are two really big triggering things for autistic people.

Jennifer Ghahari:  Great, thank you. On your website, you mentioned that males and females with autism actually present differently. Can you explain the differences?

Claire Jack:  Okay. Well, I think there are a lot of similarities, in terms of the traits, there are really big similarities, but women tend to camouflage or mask their autism. We know from a really early age, girls tend to be driven to be more social than boys. That goes from neurotypical girls and autistic girls, but there is this drive. They want to engage a bit more, little autistic girls than little autistic boys, so they find ways of trying to appear "normal" so that they pass. For that reason, girls tend to be awful lot better at making eye contact, at having conversations, at just blending in.

Also, in terms of things like interests, there seems to be a difference. The classic, what we might think of, collecting Star Wars toys or little trains or something that boys might do, collecting things, girls often become really obsessed with other people. It could be crushes, it could be bands, film stars, even a best friend.

Again, they tend to go under the radar because they're presenting very differently to boys. They still have the restricted interests, still have the social difficulties, still have all of it going on, but it tends to look really different in girls and boys.

Jennifer Ghahari:  In terms of comorbid mental health conditions, what do those with autism tend to experience? Is it anxiety, depression, things like that, or any other?

Claire Jack:  Yeah, absolutely. They tend to have really high levels of anxiety and depression. What the research shows is that that tends to be linked to the degree of camouflaging. It's not necessarily linked to how autistic you are, how severe your autism is, but how much you try and cover that. Again, women tend to maybe have worse mental health than men and that tends to be linked to how much they mask it, because when you're masking all the time, it's absolutely exhausting. It's a strange just doing anything because you're putting on such a constant act. That's a big reason for the certain mental health issues.

Suicidality is also a really big problem with autistic people, higher levels of suicidality and also more of a likelihood that it's followed through on as well. A lot of autistic, well, I don't know a lot, I'm possibly using the wrong term, but certainly some autistic people are misdiagnosed with things like bipolar disorder as well, because meltdowns can seem horrific, it can seem like a bipolar episode. Some of the extreme behavior that autistic people present with as well can sometimes be misdiagnosed as bipolar. Some people do have autism and bipolar, but the misdiagnosis is something that comes to light quite often as well.

Jennifer Ghahari:  When we diagnosis this, is it a psychiatrist, a therapist?

Claire Jack:  It's usually a psychiatrist, sometimes clinical psychologist will diagnose, for a full clinical diagnosis. Therapists, such as myself, might offer a nonclinical diagnosis. I suppose one of the reasons certainly that I offer that is just the problems that people have getting a full clinical diagnosis. The wait times can be huge, the expense can be really extreme, and so sometimes people might go to someone like myself, even as a stop-gap, so that they have something to work with whilst they're waiting a couple of years for a diagnosis.

Jennifer Ghahari:  Oh wow; years.

Claire Jack:  Yeah, absolutely. Yeah, I don't know about every country, and obviously in the UK we have the NHS, so it's a free diagnosis, but that can certainly be up to a couple of years waiting. It's a massive wait.

Jennifer Ghahari:  Which could lead, as you said, to the anxiety and depression.

Claire Jack:  Absolutely, yeah.

Jennifer Ghahari:  Wow. In terms of treatment, how would autism spectrum disorder typically be treated, from a therapeutic standpoint?

Claire Jack:  I think this is a really interesting question. The recognized treatment for autism is applied behavioral analysis, ABA. To be honest, it's not something that I've had and it's not something that I'm trained in, I'm no expert in ABA, but basically, it's... I'm trying to think of the best way to describe this. It's aimed towards people maybe having a more productive, and again, inverted commas, “normal” life. It's quite a rewards- and punishment-based therapy, as far as I know. It's not particularly popular within the autistic community, because the autistic community are of really working towards accepting autism and accepting yourself. But certainly, I think it's very common amongst autistic children, trying to almost train them to be less autistic. Like I say, it's not a very popular approach within the autistic community.

CBT can be effective, but I think what's really important is you need to go to somebody who understands autism. I've been trained in CBT and I do work with CBT, but it doesn't necessarily work with autistic people unless you really recognize the limitations, because trying to push yourself and change your beliefs and come up with new behaviors can be really impossible for people with autism. What I find is that a lot of people who have been down traditional therapy routes just haven't got the help that they need at all. A lot of them have talked about therapists, and actually I've had this experience looking for past trauma to explain what I'm experiencing, because it can present in a very similar way, and actually there's maybe nothing particular in the past that can explain what you're experiencing now.

There are autistic therapists out there. I think just having that level of understanding from a personal perspective and being able to educate your clients, I find with autistic clients, I'm educating them a lot more than I would with other clients and that's a hugely important part of therapy. But to me, therapy is all about accepting yourself, it's accepting you're autistic beginning to work to take the pressures off and work with, I don't like to call it limitations, differences. Just think, yeah, I'm different in this way, but this is a solution for it. It's all about acceptance.

Jennifer Ghahari:  Oh, that's fantastic, thank you. In terms of self-care tips, are there any that you can recommend that people can try at home or just on their own without any therapy?

Claire Jack:  Yeah. I think one of the big problems people with autism have is emotional regulation. The worst effect of that is when people have meltdowns, which can be absolutely horrific. It can involve leaving your house, putting yourself in danger, breaking things, putting other people in danger, they can be horrendous. But there are signs at some point that you are probably heading from meltdown, so it's really important to begin to recognize your own signs. They don't come out of nowhere.

You might just recognize you're a bit tired, some people might stim, so it could be touching their face or rocking backwards and forwards or pacing, or even talking a bit loud, there will be something. If you can think about it as an emotional regulation timeline, you can begin to recognize that actually you need to stop and don't go to the supermarket. I'm mentioning supermarkets because I hate them, but don't go to the supermarket if you're starting to talk a bit quickly. At that point, you start to rest. I think that's a huge tip, start to think about a timeline and what you need.

Also, you need a recovery time. I think this is, again, autistic people are different. They take ages to recover from a meltdown. It might be hours, it could even be days. You need to think, “Do I need to rest here, do I need to avoid something?” There's a theory that lot of people use, called “spoons theory”, and it was actually developed by somebody with I think it was chronic fatigue, it was some kind of chronic illness. It's a great way to think about self-care. You need to think, “I have X amount of spoons this morning, so I've got 10 spoons. I'm not going to get anymore, when they're gone, they're gone.” I can think, “Right, I've got a meeting, that's two spoons, I've got the school run, that's going to be three, but I don't get any more at the end of the day.” You might actually only be starting with six. It's a real check in with yourself and thinking, I don't have limitless capacity, because fatigue is a huge thing as well.

I like to think of it in terms of pebbles, because I live by the coast. Literally, you have your pebbles. You can even take a pebble out with you, but you just don't get anymore. Again, without being negative or trying to think about limitations, it is a reality check, that you do need to look after yourself or you could end up being exhausted and frazzled and have a meltdown and all of these other things.

Jennifer Ghahari:  Yeah, I think you bring up a good point. I think a lot of people without autism don't realize how bad a meltdown can be, number one. Yes, people can witness it, but then, like you said, the recovery can be hours or days. Autistic people really need to do self-care. If they can't go to an event or if they're wearing noise-canceling headphones, it's not because they want to look stylish or interesting, it's because they actually need to do this for their own health.

Claire Jack:  Yep, yep, absolutely. I know a lot of my clients love noise canceling headphones and some will wear them in the house. I was talking to someone recently, big family, including stepchildren, and just the noise at dinner time was just too much to cope with, and she started to wear these. Her family thought it was amusing at first then they accepted it. It just made such a difference. Yeah, but yeah, it's not about trying to look for attention or anything else, it is about trying to keep yourself safe.

Jennifer Ghahari:  That's great. I'm glad that client found that way to do it.

Claire Jack:  Yeah, it's amazing. I think once you accept it, the solutions you come up with are really inventive.

Jennifer Ghahari:  This has gone by pretty quickly. I always think that's a good sign of a good interview. Usually, we wrap up our interviews by asking if you have any parting words of advice. I'm actually going to ask you that twice. First, do you have any parting words of advice that you'd like to offer for those diagnosed with autism disorder?

Claire Jack:  I think it's a really difficult thing at the beginning to come to terms with, particularly for adults. I think it's different if you've maybe known since you were younger, and certainly the way parents impart that knowledge to their children is really important. But I think just if you find out a bit later in life, as most of my clients have, you've got to be really patient with yourself. It can be scary, you can think, “My life's going to be limited, I can't have the career I want, can I have a family?” Yes, you can do all of these things, but you maybe need to just find different ways of managing it, but it really doesn't have to limit your life in any way.

To me, it's something that it can really open up doors and it can open up new ways of thinking and being once you've begun to accept it. I think that's the really important thing. If you keep battling against, it's always going to appear like this terrible thing that's going to hold you back, but if you can accept it... Autistic people tend to have different ways of viewing the world, they maybe have different talents, they might be particularly good in some areas, so once you can accept all of that, then you can lead this incredible, rich life. It might be slightly different or it might work in slightly different ways, and that's completely fine. I think it's accepting that that's completely fine.

Jennifer Ghahari:  Do you have any words of advice for those without autism that you want them to be aware and cognizant of?

Claire Jack:  Well, I think first of all, the client base that I work with, you wouldn't know they're autistic. I think some people think they're giving a compliment by saying that, “You don't look autistic at all,” which is actually really frustrating because they don't see what's happening in the background. When I went to my GP initially to ask for a referral to a psychiatrist, I was just completely knocked back on the basis that I can have a conversation, I can smile, I can look somebody in the eyes. I'd done tons of research and I really tried to explain why and what was going on for me, and it was, "You don't look autistic." I think it's terribly important, if you're not autistic, don't judge somebody, because you don't know how much effort they are putting into something.

It's also, I think, really important to recognize it's real. Most of the people that I work with tend to be really lucky in terms of their partners. I think autistic people are often drawn together anyway, but even if there is a non-autistic partner, most of my clients have had a lot of support, but I have had some clients who've had a really horrible experience from husbands and partners who will not believe that they're autistic and it doesn't seem to matter what they say. Even when they get a full diagnosis, they will not believe it.

I think if somebody has a diagnosis, even if they haven't, even if they're self-diagnosing and have done the research, what they're experiencing is very real. Just because you don't understand it doesn't mean it's not real. Again, just thinking about autistic people having to be inventive with some of their solutions is a great opportunity for partners, children, parents, to be inventive with the autistic person as well, be open to it. Accept if they don't want to do something, they don't have to do that thing. You can probably work around it, you can come up with a different solution. If they don't want to come to your family party, fine. Do they have to go? Probably not.

It's about, I guess, looking at societal norms, which very much are made to fit neurotypical people. This is where I'm going into my anthropology bit here, and I'm thinking, well, do we have to adhere to these norms, and why would we? I think, again, it's a great opportunity, but people have to be really open to accepting their loved one or colleagues or whoever has autism and thinking I can either treat this in a way that's going to stress this person or I can support them, because this is absolutely real for them.

Jennifer Ghahari:  That's really great. Thank you so much. Dr. Jack, it's been wonderful talking with you today and we really appreciate your contributions to our interview series.

Claire Jack:  Thank you.

Jennifer Ghahari:  Have a good day.

Please note: The views expressed by the interviewee are for educational and informational purposes only, are not meant to diagnose or treat any condition, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Seattle Anxiety Specialists, PLLC.


Editor: Jennifer (Ghahari) Smith, Ph.D.

Social Worker Erin Maloney on the Innocent Lives Foundation

An Interview with Social Worker Erin Maloney

Erin Maloney, LCSW is the Director of Wellness for the Innocent Lives Foundation. She is a licensed clinical social worker specializing in trauma, addiction, ADHD, anxiety, depression, and other mood disorders.

Theresa Nair:  Thank you for joining us today for this installment of the Seattle Psychiatrist Interview series. I'm Theresa Nair, a research intern at Seattle Anxiety Specialists. We are a Seattle-based psychiatry, psychology and psychotherapy practice specializing in anxiety disorders.

I'd like to welcome with us clinical social worker, Erin Maloney, who is the Director of Wellness for the Innocent Lives Foundation. Erin earned her Bachelor Degree of Science and Psychology from St. Joseph's University in Philadelphia, and a Master's Degree in Social Work from Widener University in Chester.

She is currently a licensed clinical social worker specializing in trauma, addiction, secondary trauma, ADHD, anxiety, depression, and other mood disorders. Thank you for joining us today, Erin.

Erin Maloney:  Thank you for having me.

Theresa Nair:  Before we get started, can you please tell us a little bit more about yourself and what made you interested in studying clinical social work?

Erin Maloney:  Absolutely. I am a little bit about me. I am a mother of three. I also have a husband and a dog. I live in Scranton, Pennsylvania, like “The Office”. I have always been interested in mental health, actually since a very young age. I told my mom probably about five, six years old that I wanted to become a therapist and she just pushed me along to do whatever I wanted and follow my dreams.

I did, I entered into psychology and I loved it and I worked for quite a bit with my Bachelor's doing case management type work, but I realized I needed to further my education. While I was finished with my Bachelor's, I saw a plethora of therapists in the company that I worked for. It was a nonprofit behavioral health clinic and I saw everybody from LPCs to LSWs, LMFTs, every acronym in the book.

But my immediate supervisor was an LCSW and I found that she had the most, at the time for me, the most variety of opportunities. She could be a director of a program we might have had for behavioral health for children. Or, she could have actually done private practice type work, and I liked that because I could see a lot of settings.

That's when I decided to embark into Widener. I worked full time but got my Master's at night, and I really enjoyed finding that I wanted to keep pursuing from my Masters to license into the clinical license. That's how I got started in it. Always had an interest, always had an interest in people's minds and how it worked.

Theresa Nair:  That's great. It's wonderful when you feel like you're pursuing your purpose and even your calling.

Erin Maloney:  Yes, yes.

Theresa Nair:  For those who are not familiar with your organization, I'm wondering if you can tell us a little bit about the mission of the Innocent Lives Foundation and how it works to bring anonymous child predators to justice?

Erin Maloney:  Absolutely. I just want to say at this point, just a quick little trigger warning. My foundation does deal with trauma related to children and exploitation in any sort of assault. So just a little trigger if anybody is listening in to take care of yourself before or after. I don't think much will come up, but I always like to give that in advance.

Innocent Lives Foundation, what we do is our mission is to do that. We try to get the predators who are hiding online behind the scenes who are trying to exploit children or publish and/or share materials of, we call CSAM, Child Sexual Assault Material. That's our biggest mission is to bring to light the people hiding, to get them out of the dark and get them prosecuted properly.

Now, one of the things I always like to mention is we are non-vigilante. That is a very important part of our mission. We do not set ourselves up as young children. We do not try to entrap perpetrators. This is actually information we find on the open web. It's unbelievable what you would find on the open web, but we use what they call OSINT, which is open-source intelligence. It's basically anything any of us could find on the web, but they know where and how to look specifically for predators laying right within our children.

What we do at the ILF is we get leads and it could be come from, we have a form right on our website that people can enter. It could be a parent concerned about maybe who their children are chatting with. We might get law enforcement to say, "Hey, we could really use some good computer diving hacking skills to find out this case."

Or, it could actually come directly from somebody who might give it to us. Or, our researchers actually are doing the research and they can find a lead. Just be so maybe a username or somebody having an inappropriate photo up. We have, at ILF, different aspects that I wanted to go into because it sounds very confusing. What are you guys doing?

We have three distinct teams. We have what we call The PIT, which is Predator Identification Team, and they're our researchers and they are phenomenal hackers. We call them good guy hackers. They use their skills for good and they're all volunteers. But what they do is they are literally the ones behind the computer doing all the research for us finding this.

We have Education and Outreach Team, which those are our people who are more about putting out blogs, putting out educational materials, fundraising for us. They're really good for caregivers who might be struggling with anything like this.

Then lastly, we have a Development Team and what they do is they actually protect our PIT by developing tools that they can use to protect our PIT people from what they see. One of the big things we have is a blur tool so that our researchers are not seeing actual skin, they just see a blurred image and they can unblur it enough to maybe see a face if they need it, but it's to help them not be exposed to so much content in terms of that.

Those are our three distinct teams, and so what we do at ILF is we all work together in tandem to basically have that one common mission to help bring predators out of the light.

Theresa Nair:  That's great. I mean it's really interesting that you have the blur tool.

Erin Maloney:  Yes.

Theresa Nair:  Because I was wondering, how do you search for this without seeing all of it? So, that would be helpful.

Erin Maloney:  Yes, yes. We very much try to protect. Unfortunately, sometimes the text cases are some of the hardest because you're reading it and your mind goes there, but we still try to protect as much as can.

Theresa Nair:  Is that on the general internet or what's referred to as the dark web?

Erin Maloney:  Yes. Yeah. There is a whole dark web that we are aware of, but we actually try to leave that to law enforcement to do themselves because it is such a gray area. We keep everything above board. Like I said, we're trying to not be vigilantes, not get ourselves in trouble.

Everything people do, even our researchers do things on a device of ours so they're never caught with any sort of material or viewing. We would never want anybody be in trouble of any sort, so everything is done through a computer they have from us with tools and things like that to protect them.

Theresa Nair:  Okay, that's good. That helps to clarify how you even do something like this?

Erin Maloney:  Yes, yes, exactly.

Theresa Nair:  You spend a lot of your time working with volunteers within the organization, the people who are using their skills in order to help identify child predators. You're providing counseling services, I believe. Can you explain why it's important to provide this type of service to the volunteers, and what types of mental health impacts can result from this line of work?

Erin Maloney:  Absolutely. As this started, my CEO he realized quickly, he actually started Innocent Lives Foundation by accident. He is what they call a pen tester. His company does do security breaches for companies to help them learn how to improve the security of their companies.

In doing so, he accidentally stumbled upon child sexual assault material on somebody's device and was able to turn that into law enforcement. It was very validating and reassuring for him and he thought, "I did this so easily, why couldn't we do this as something like a nonprofit or a mission?" He started it from there, which really led to, but he knew the importance of the mental health piece. He said, "If we do this, we have to make sure we're not harming anybody in doing so."

That's how it's always been a proponent since day one. I'm part of every aspect from when they get onboarded. We have a very extensive onboarding. People go through various interviews, and one is a wellness assessment with me because again, we are trying not to damage anybody. If there's significant trauma that's maybe unprocessed or raw still, we're not going to want to have somebody in that capacity working right now with us.

By doing that now you had said, so there's the component of me meeting them early on and then I actually meet with them once a month if they are what we call The PIT, so at minimum they have to meet with me once a month. If you are in another aspect of our team like Education Outreach or Development, you only have to reach out with me once every three months because obviously they're not dealing with the content as much. Like I said, it's different timeframes for different people.

So, that's how I work with them. Now, if somebody has a already current mental health... Now remember, these people are coming voluntarily and not all of them have a psychological disorder. Not all of them have an Axis 1 diagnosis. However, some do and when they do, I make it very clear that I'm more of a wellness piece. If they need extensive work, if there's somebody that I sense needs almost weekly sessions or if they have an addiction they're struggling with or anything even more significant, then I definitely refer them out to a private therapist in their area and/or medication management or other resources.

Then I actually collaborate with any of the people they need me to collaborate with because it is such a unique setting situation. If a therapist needs a little bit of advice or what we do where we do, I'll consult with them as well. I'm involved with them quite a bit, at least once a month and I have a very good rapport with all the volunteers.

Theresa Nair:  Do you find that people may need more services the longer that they do this? Or maybe after particular incidents? Are there maybe something in particular that they find or is it steady?

Erin Maloney:  No, you know what it is? Actually, it's not the work that I notice, it's life changes that impact their volunteering with me. When I say that, we have new parents, for example. Let's say a volunteer has never been a parent, but suddenly they're a parent and they might be one of our researchers. They may not suddenly be able to stomach what they once stomached, and so they may very well say, "I cannot."

We actually have a pause program which is completely non punitive. It's something the volunteer can initiate, or myself if I really sense somebody's just not doing well, I'd encourage that. Really, up to 90 days they can just quietly stay with us. They can join meetings if they want, they can meet with me if they want, but they're not required to do any sort of minimal work for us to keep them active as a volunteer, which is nice.

Then the other option is we also have moving around. We had one PIT member who had a hard time, again with children, and almost sometimes people could actually put their child's face on a victim, which you'd never want to see happen. That is, we never want to damage anybody. So, that person actually still wanted to be with our mission so they stepped aside to Education Outreach and they write educational blogs, or they might speak publicly at a local community event for themselves.

It's really neat. You can still move around and help with that very same mission, but not damage yourself psychologically if you are struggling. I don't find the work... I feel like if people are already here in the mindset to do this type of work, then they've either been exposed to things or they're pretty prepared to compartmentalize their brain to step into this work and step out of this work.

Theresa Nair:  That's interesting because you would assume that maybe it was something that they saw. But it's interesting that it's more life changes that they might be going through.

Erin Maloney:  It truly is. Yep.

Theresa Nair:  And what they're able to view at different points in their life.

Erin Maloney:  We have a very strong level system, that when they start, they start at a very bare... it's more just finding leads. Maybe finding usernames that might be connected to something, and then there's levels. We're not going to have somebody brand new coming in exposed to something that might be very horrific.

I don't even, age is a big factor. Maybe younger children might be too difficult for them, so we're not going to do that. We're going to have them work up in levels and so that they're not really exposed to anything too much too fast because they could process with me the whole time they're doing it whether they're okay or not with that.

I'll check in on them with their case and how it's affecting them and generally fits good and they seem like they're confident with it, then they can move up in the level system, if you will.

Theresa Nair:  Sounds like there's a lot of options for volunteering.

Erin Maloney:  Yes, yes. We do not let it damage or harm anybody because they're helping us. They're volunteering for us, so we would never want to do anything that could hurt somebody.

Theresa Nair:  Okay. I know you've mentioned, and it says on the webpage as well, that you use cognitive behavioral therapy to assist your work with Innocent Lives Foundation.

Erin Maloney:  Yeah.

Theresa Nair:  Could you talk a little bit about how you use that, and then also if there's any other techniques that you find to be productive?

Erin Maloney:  Absolutely. Like I said before, my wellness sessions are typical check-ins. How are you doing, tell me what's going on in your life? But what I listen for and people know, all the volunteers know I use cognitive behavioral therapy because I'm listening for any sort of negative or illogical thoughts and they know that and they know when I can pinpoint that, what I might hear.

If I sense that somebody's really struggling with something, then we will start using cognitive behavioral techniques to see if we can figure out whether this is something more pressing, either a budding anxiety disorder. Or, if this is just something in their lives, maybe an adjustment to something that they're dealing with.

I do a lot of reframing. If I initially hear them say something negative, I might put it in a different reframe. If they're like, "Oh yeah, yeah, yeah" and they get that and I don't hear it again, then I realize they might have just been dealing with something. What I do a lot of with the volunteers is activity scheduling in terms of cognitive behavioral therapy. Because what we do is you would not be able to necessarily do this work in front of your family in the middle maybe of a work day. There's a lot of this content that cannot be exposed. We have to activity schedule, is it best to do this maybe an hour? But you don't want to do it right before bed either. Maybe there's an evening hour that this is best for. Or, perhaps you have a quiet hour in the day with nobody around you. We do that to find the best for a person to pick the time that they can do this type of work.

Role playing. If somebody's struggling with anything really in their lives, but in particular maybe wanting to switch gears in ILF, I might help role play with them. Maybe if they want to approach that with our COO and how they might be able to switch over into a different capacity.

So, I do a lot, now again, if I sense it's something more, then I will encourage them to seek out therapy on an ongoing basis so they can do real true weekly or even twice a week sessions if needed. But generally with some cognitive behavioral therapy, I could figure out if it's something more or not, and that's what I tend to do.

Theresa Nair:  Okay, and do you tend to see any increases in anxiety or depression from the volunteers when they work for maybe an extended period of time on this?

Erin Maloney:  Well, it's funny you said that. If I do sense that, then that's again where I will go into that pause option. "Hey, do you need to pause? Are things getting too much for you?" But it's funny you say that, I've actually seen it go both ways. Where I've seen it in the negative might be, again, if they have a, let's say they're starting a new job position and this is their volunteer position, they might have too much on their plate and so their anxiety's increasing and then they have guilt about not doing their volunteer work, then there's all that.

If I sense that, then we definitely encourage a pause and again, a pause could be 30 days. It doesn't have to be 90 days, but we just encourage that you take a little mental break, take a break from us and come back when you're refreshed and ready.

However, it goes on the other side where this work is very validating sometimes. Because a lot of our volunteers may either have been a survivor of assault in their past. They could have been groomed as a child themselves, or they have a family member who this maybe impacts. When they have a case that's a win, that is completely validating. It's a way to take power back from maybe where they've felt powerless in their past. It can actually be very, very good mentally as well.

The only struggle with that is the reality is we don't always get feedback from law enforcement of how our case is? We hand in a report to law enforcement, but it might not always be clear whether that case went to trial, whether that person was convicted.

We don't always get the information, and so I have to make sure the volunteer's okay with that, that we're not always going to know every win. Are you going to be able to stay motivated on cases you don't know the answer to? There's a lot of areas to poke around in there.

Theresa Nair:  That is interesting. There's that sense of empowerment, right?

Erin Maloney:  Yes, yes.

Theresa Nair:  When they're able to do something, but I'm sure it's a little frustrating when you just never know what happens?

Erin Maloney:  Yes. Exactly, exactly. But that's not our role. We don't want fame, we don't want to be associated with putting somebody away. We are really truly just totally behind the scenes trying to help. We have the computer skills to find a lot of people and we try to hand that over to law enforcement, and so we don't always get the answers.

Theresa Nair:  Do you think there's other areas of volunteer work, or perhaps other professions in general that would benefit from providing these types of mental health services to volunteers or to employees?

Erin Maloney:  Yes. It's funny you say that. We have some volunteers who are either currently or ex-military, or current or ex law enforcement. They have said many times that if they had somebody at their office to talk to, it could have made a major difference for them with some of the things that they endured or witnessed.

I know there's a lot of EAP programs for companies, but I think there is something at me being here every day for them that makes a very big difference. They just know. I get to know them very well. It's a stable, long-lasting relationship, and so they don't have to re-explain themselves to somebody new. I'm part of the team itself and employed there, so it makes a big difference I think in that consistency that they know I'm here and they could come to me at any time.

Theresa Nair:  It seems it might also be beneficial that you have a regular scheduled monthly meeting at least with everybody.

Erin Maloney:  Yes.

Theresa Nair:  Because I think sometimes in workplace mental health services, people are afraid to use them because they're afraid of being stigmatized even if somebody sees them going to talk to the person, or if the boss finds out that they're talking to the person. Do you think it's helpful just going ahead and scheduling appointments with everybody?

Erin Maloney:  Yeah, I really do. It's so funny you say that. Yeah, because I could definitely tell there's a resistance. Our team, for the most part, it is a lot of people who happen to be in cyber security type industry. When you're in that industry, you actually tend to be, not to stereotype an entire group, but sometimes you tend to be introverted and private.

Therefore, I do think this forces people a little bit out of their comfort zone and then they do realize, "Oh, this isn't so bad." Because I'm not deep diving way into their past, Freudian style. It is non-confrontational. I go at their pace and whatever they choose to talk about. Obviously, we talk about case work, but anything else they might need to address.

It gives them a huge shift if they already had a fear or resistance to therapy where it's not so bad for them after a while, once they get to know me better. Yeah, I agree. I think it's very good that it's almost forced upon them and I send out reminders and I reach out.

If they avoid me after a certain amount of time, then we have to do the whole, "Are you trying to pause? Is there something you need?" So, it's nice, but that's rare that I don't hear from somebody

Theresa Nair:  Then it's, "Well, I'm talking to her anyway. I may as well have a real conversation, right?"

Erin Maloney:  Exactly. The other thing to this is that again you mentioned, you asked about different fields. Well, law enforcement or some other heavy content type professions, they can't turn to their family or their loved ones and just spill what happened in their day, similar to this type of work. They're not going to turn and say, "Guess what this case is about?" You can't. You want to protect your own loved ones and family and friends.

A lot of our volunteers are anonymous, so this gives them a direct place to process what they need to process without feeling they're burdening anybody. Without feeling like they're going to hurt or harm anybody. It's just a safe space for them dedicated to them, and I feel like it gives them that open door.

Theresa Nair:  Then they can talk about that case work that they maybe couldn't discuss with other people.

Erin Maloney:  Exactly, exactly.

Theresa Nair:  I think that's a great model. I wish more places would do that.

Erin Maloney:  I do too. I do too. It's very nice, and I do feel like with law enforcement in particular, I think of that field and just the things that come home from, or anybody on the front lines really. After a really rough day of what you might witness or see or hear, and then you have to go home with that.

That's where I feel for people when they don't have any place to just unload that on, and making the time. That's the other thing you had mentioned. We all have a hard time making the time, and at least with this, it's mandatory so it's part of your volunteer. We ask people to volunteer if they're volunteering with us for about 10 hours a month if possible, but that includes a lot.

We have a team meeting, which is once a month. We have myself, would be an hour so that's already detracting right off their volunteer hours for us, so it helps that it's just built right in for them.

Theresa Nair:  Right, and then they don't have to take the initiative to seek out speaking to somebody. It's just a part of it.

Erin Maloney:  Exactly, exactly.

Theresa Nair:  Well, as someone who specializes in cognitive behavior techniques to support the mental health of those engaged in volunteer work, do you have any parting words of advice or anything else you'd like to share with our listeners?

Erin Maloney:  Sure. I mention this to volunteers all the time, and I would like for your listeners to know. I think balancing life is the key. You really have to balance your life, and volunteering is actually a very worthy and beneficial cause to you. This really helps fuel your soul. But if the plate's full and you just need to get rid of something, then that's generally, unfortunately some self-care things or things we do for ourselves might be some of the first things to go.

So, I just always say, "Stay balanced." But if you are realizing you can't manage everything, you can't problem solve, you're losing your focus, you don't want to burn out. Really, I always say we cannot, you do not want to burn out. Before you start, that's where, going back to the cognitive behavioral I therapy, I listen for the negative.

If I start hearing negative comments and negative thoughts that are just kind of untrue, I really try to help reframe. But if it's not possible, then we have to look at what they might have to cut out of their lives? What they might have to do to manage things? Balancing life, self-care is very important, but you need to know when you need to step back and maybe make some changes.

Theresa Nair:  That's great advice. Well, thank you so much for making the time to speak with us and participating in our interview series.

Erin Maloney:  Thank you. Thank you for having me. I just want to make sure I tell you guys that you can always go to our website, innocentlivesfoundation.com. There are great resources and tools on there. If anybody ever had to make a report of anything they were concerned with, again, it could be a parent, a caregiver, a teacher.

If somebody's concerned about maybe what a child's posting or who a child's speaking with or they're unsure of things that are online, you can always submit a report right there and we'll reach out and see what we can help investigate for you. Please use us as a resource as needed. Again, we have great blogs and articles on there and things that you might find very helpful.

Theresa Nair:  That's great, and we will also link to that website underneath our interview so that people can find it easily.

Erin Maloney:  Wonderful. That sounds great.

Theresa Nair:  Okay. Thank you so much for joining us today.

Erin Maloney:  Of course. Thanks for having me.

Please note: The views expressed by the interviewee are for educational and informational purposes only, are not meant to diagnose or treat any condition, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Seattle Anxiety Specialists, PLLC.


Editor: Jennifer (Ghahari) Smith, Ph.D.

Psychologist Norman Cotterell on utilizing CBT

An Interview with Psychologist Norman Cotterell

Dr. Cotterell is a Senior Clinician at the Beck Institute and specializes in the use of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT).


Jennifer Ghahari:  Hey, thanks for joining us today for this installment of The Seattle Psychiatrist Interview Series. I'm Dr. Jennifer Ghahari, Research Director at Seattle Anxiety Specialists. I'd like to welcome with us psychologist, Norman Cotterell. Dr. Cotterell is a Senior Clinician at the Beck Institute and specializes in the utilization of cognitive behavioral therapy. Before we get started, can you please let us know a little bit more about yourself and what made you interested in CBT?

Norman Cotterell:  Oh, wow. I think it happened by accident because before my first day in graduate school, and this is like Beckian cognitive therapy, because really I went to college interested in geology and musical theater, and then I took the psychology class in freshman year where they showed... Remember that video where they showed Albert Ellis and Fritz Pearls and Carl Rogers seeing the same person?

Jennifer Ghahari:  Yes.

Norman Cotterell:  This is black and white movie. And that probably was my first introduction was, something in the CBT realm was seeing Albert Ellis in action with that individual. And then later on, I became a major in psychology and I was told you had to do that. And I was told early on, I was told back in 1978 in the psychology program, which had no clinical advisor until my junior year. In fact, my supervisor or advisor when I was an undergraduate, called psychotherapy, "Oh, you're interested in the talking cure." So it wasn't exactly pushing psychotherapy at that point.

They finally hired a clinical advisor, my junior year in college. And he told me basically the only version of therapy that he considered that had a future, was worthwhile, was in the CBT realm.


Jennifer Ghahari:  Wow.

Norman Cotterell:  Yeah. And that was in 1978. The guy was prescient, if anything else. And so I went to University of Delaware and I think right before my very first class, the weekend before classes started, I wandered into, I guess, Art Freeman giving an all day workshop in CBT.

Jennifer Ghahari:  Oh, wow.

Norman Cotterell:  He said, "Oh, come on, have a seat, come on in," and sat in. So before my very first class in graduate school, I sat in on a workshop on Beckian CBT.

Jennifer Ghahari:  Wow.

Norman Cotterell:  Cognitive therapy at that point. And so that was in the back of my mind ever since. And I got my chance to do my postdoctoral fellowship there in 1989 and I've been here ever since. It's been a 32-year postdoc. It's a pretty simple career trajectory, basically that was it.

Jennifer Ghahari:  It was the right fit. Yeah.

Norman Cotterell:  Yeah. It was absolutely the right fit. And even my last lecture in undergraduate was Viktor Frankl. It was standing-room only, I literally sat at his feet while he was talking about his experience at Auschwitz, where I remember him saying the two things enabled him to survive was what's intact. Number one, finding a reason for living. And at that point his only reason for living was to find a reason for living. The only thing gave him meaning was to search for meaning. The only thing gave him purpose was that search for purpose. And the other thing was maintaining a sense of humor. Said he's not going to let the Nazis take that away from him.

Jennifer Ghahari:  Oh, wow.

Norman Cotterell:  Yeah. That maintained him. So those experiences got me on this path and I've been with Beck’s since 1989 and that's basically my journey. And just in working on projects after that, I mean, I got thrown into a panic disorder study as soon as I got there. And then, there were protocol therapists for studies involving generalized anxiety disorder, refractory depression, bipolar crack cocaine addiction, later on a health psychology project involving camping out in primary care physician offices. So I saw people with positive HIV status or AIDS with end-stage diabetes, with chronic pain, cancer treatments and so forth. End-stage life issues - seeing people who were terminally ill. And I did that for a couple years before I transferred. It was back in '96 when I transferred in-house from the Center for Cognitive Therapy to the Beck Institute. But same folks because in '94, Beck took half the staff moved them to Bala Cynwyd when I stayed at Penn. And then two years later I traded places with a fellow who went back to Penn from the Beck Institute. And I went from Penn to the Beck Institute.

Jennifer Ghahari:  Nice.

Norman Cotterell:  But we're basically sister clinics.

Jennifer Ghahari:  Right. Yeah. That's great. So obviously, you know what you're talking about when it comes to CBT, which is...

Norman Cotterell:  I'm still learning here. (laughing) We're all students, you know?

Jennifer Ghahari:  Exactly.

Norman Cotterell:  Yeah.

Jennifer Ghahari:  So on that note, many of our clients reach out to us specifically requesting CBT because they've heard of it, they read a little bit about it, someone's recommended it to treat what they're experiencing... And so can you explain what is CBT and what type of issues can it used to treat? I know you just mentioned a few of them, but in general what's it used for?

Norman Cotterell:  Well, yeah. I mean, goes all the way back to Greek slave philosopher Epictetus. The idea that he had is that it's not the situations that make us feel the way we do, it's our beliefs about them. So it's the thoughts and beliefs that create or enable people to interpret situations that give rise to specific emotions. Probably the most important question he asked initially is, "When you experience said emotion triggered by said experience, what was running through your mind? What words, images and pictures are running through your mind?"

That gives a clue as far as your interpretations and your beliefs that may underlie those particular thoughts. As far as experiences, the experiences can be internal. They can be external, they can be interpersonal. You can have beliefs rising from physical sensations, beliefs rising from urges, beliefs being triggered by intrusive thoughts. I see as being the internal experiences can reflect body belief and behavior. Body is manifested in sensations. Belief is manifested in thoughts and behavior is manifested in urges.

So I'd say sensations, thoughts and urges can serve as triggers for activating beliefs, which can exacerbate those sensations, exacerbate those thoughts if they get triggered and exacerbate those urges as well. And then external triggers, things you see smell, taste, touch, or do, what people do with you, in front of you, circumstances that are external to you, interpersonal things that people say to you and your relationships with people can all trigger or activate particular beliefs, which can account for how we react to those situations. And of course it goes down in a circle because you can have beliefs about your reactions as well, so it can spiral up that way.


Jennifer Ghahari:  And so what type of issues can CBT treat?

Norman Cotterell:  Yeah. Well, Beck started off just really focusing on depression. I mean, you might know that oddly enough his version of CBT started with dream analysis. There's been pushback on this whether in fact that was the case, but really by his telling of it, he was doing a dream analysis to look at that theory of Freud, that depression was anger turned inward. Depression, what is depression? It's anger turned inward. So he looked at the dreams of depressed people to find that theme of anger turned inward and didn't find it. What he found instead, which was not only true in dream is also true in waking life is that people tended to have a negative view of three areas in their lives: a negative view of themselves, a negative view of their personal world, a negative view of their future.

And when they saw themselves at a negative light, it triggered a bit of a hibernation instinct or hibernation response. And with hibernation, motivation goes down. With hibernation, energy goes down. With hibernation, your interest in life goes down. And as your interest, energy and motivation drops, you feel worse about yourself. You feel more inadequate, which triggers more hibernation, which can affect how you see your personal world. It colors your world the way a drop of ink would color a glass of water. And your personal world takes on a more negative light, which causes a further drop in motivation, energy and interest, which in turn makes you feel worse about your future. What kind of future is this? I don't have a future or the future is nonexistent. The future is really horrible, which can make you feel even more inclined to hibernate.

So the insights that he had, this is in his evolutionary theory of depression was that depression it's like a hibernation instinct. Depression, if there's a purpose for it is to conserve energy rather than to waste it under fruitless and useless pursuit. And depression tells us that everything is fruitless. Everything is useless. So what's the point? For you to do anything to change your life is as fruitless as a bear looking for food under 12 feet of snow, give it up, forget about it, go to your cave, curl up in a fetal position, suck your thumb, wait for the day to end, because anything you do is doom to failure. Forget about it kid, go back to your cave and hibernate, hibernate, hibernate. And what fuels that is that classic depressive triad, negative view of self, negative view of personal world. Negative view of future, which triggers hibernation, makes feeling worse about themselves, their world and their future. So it spirals down that way.

And it was interesting design for that. I mean, and there are two points of intervention. The behavioral intervention is what depression does. It's a hibernation instinct, motivation, energy, interest goes down. And the insight that Beck wrote about in cognitive therapy depression is that you don't sit around and wait for motivation to come knocking at your door. Motivation is sleeping, but there's one thing that's going to wake up motivation and that's action. You take action. If you sit around waiting for motivation knocking at your door, it's not going to happen. It won’t spontaneously say, "Hey, I'm motivation." You'll be waiting forever. You take action in the absence of motivation. And people do that with depression. There’s not supposed to be any motivation whatsoever. It's sleeping - wake it up. And it’s taking action first without the necessity, without the belief let's say that, "I have to have motivation before I can move my left pinkie. I have to have motivation before I move my foot."

Well, we do things quite often without any motivation whatsoever. We go through the motions and with depression going through the motions is brilliant. Going through the motions is a great achievement. Why? Because it is so bloody difficult. And so giving one credit for everything that you do with depression, because doing anything with depression is a sign of strength. By doing anything with depression is a sign of strength and to acknowledge that strength, give yourself credit for it. And that's a behavioral aspect and that’s our first intervention. In fact, one time I remember seeing
Aaron Beck, Tim, as we called him, ATB, as we used in communication, passed away recently.

Jennifer Ghahari:  I’m so sorry for your loss.

Norman Cotterell:  And he's like one of my few remaining father figures. He was my academic father for the past 32 years.

Jennifer Ghahari:  Oh wow.

Norman Cotterell:  Yeah. It's a long time. But I saw him working with an individual who wanted to delve deep into beliefs, wanted to delve deep in terms of schema, wanted to delve deep in terms of his thoughts. And Dr. Beck told him, "You're not ready for that yet." That they were not ready for that. We need to do the behavioral work first. We need to take you off the ledge first and work behaviorally before you even touch. And that was from the father of cognitive therapy. Who's telling this guy, "We need to work on behavioral activation first." Yeah, but that is often first line of attack, do nothing-ism, behavioral activation. Really that first thing.

And then the cognitive aspect is what depression tells us. Depression is your worst best friend telling you, "Look, kid, you're crap. Your world is crap. Your future is crap. So give up." And it's a propagandist. And it's like, somebody who's printing up signs, printing up propaganda left and right. "You're crap, the world is crap. The future is crap and you're crap. The world..." And that's what it does. That's what it does for a living. That's depression doing its job. But you don't have to buy into those thoughts. You don't have to base your actions on those thoughts. In some ways there's a story from Kierkegaard where he's walking down the street, seen a sign on the shop window. Sign says, "Clothes pressed here." So he goes home, gets his clothing, plops it down the counter.

The shopkeeper says, "What are you doing that for?" Well, he said, "I saw the sign on windows says, 'clothes pressed here." And the shopkeeper says, "I don't press clothes, man. I make signs." Well, basing your actions on what depression tells you is like getting your clothes pressed at a sign making store. Depression is in the business of printing up signs. "Look, kid, you're crap. The world is crap. The future is crap. Give up. You're crap. The world is crap. Your future is crap. Give up." That's what it does. It's doing its job. But you don't have to buy into it. You don't have to base your actions on it. And as Steve Hayes, often said, "Don't believe a thing your mind tells you."


Jennifer Ghahari:  Yeah, exactly.

Norman Cotterell:  That would be the case where Steve Hayes council would be absolutely 100% on target, "Don't believe a thing your mind tells you." Especially when it's providing those depressive messages, where you base your behavior on, you base your actions, what's truly important in life. And if you're sitting around saying, "What's my motivation? What's my motivation?" Like a method actor. "What's my motivation? What's my motivation? Well, I can't move a finger until I know what my..." Well, far often people are depressed. Only motivation is they hate depression.

Jennifer Ghahari:  That'll work.

Norman Cotterell:  Yeah. That's it. But they don't even need that. They just need to move the muscles first. So that was really what cognitive therapy was designed for. What Beck designed it for was really depression and his great perspective being the depressive triad, leading to loss of motivation, energy and interest, which kind of led up back to that depressive triad negative view of self, versus the world and the future. And then they applied it to anxiety disorders. And initially it was hard to apply to anxiety because oftentimes people didn't have thoughts.

They did not have automatic thoughts with anxiety. They had strategies, they had behaviors and really they had to adapt some of the techniques of Beckian CBT to deal with people who... What's going through your mind?

Nothing. And dealing with the absence of that, which really meant that a lot of behavioral work with anxiety disorders involved identifying and eliminating people's reliance on safety behaviors and also dealing with beliefs about anxiety. As you know, very much the current wisdom is which we replicated the study from David M. Clark's group at Oxford University when I first got to Penn in 1989. Replicating the study at Oxford on panic disorder. I got thrown into that. Saw nothing but people with panic disorder when I first came to Penn. And the model that we used really had to do with individuals with panic, having a catastrophic misinterpretation of anxiety itself.

Yeah. In fact, David M. Clark, who was one of the first people I met at Penn, he was actually in resident. He was visiting there when I came, saying that was the one case where the DSM actually had a cognitive interpretation built into the guidelines for diagnosis. That is a catastrophic misinterpretation of untriggered anxiety. Only for a
panic attack is having an unexpected sensation, which you catastrophically misinterpret and that gets the ball rolling. "I'm dying. I'm losing control." Either loss of physical control, loss of psychological control, either way it's catastrophic, it's immediate. And he also described the continuum between let's say panic and hypochondriasis or health anxiety as we call it now, in which with panic, you're dying now, you're losing control now, it is happening right now at this minute. Health anxiety: sometime in the future.

It's just a matter of timing. That I will eventually die, that I will eventually lose control. I will eventually... And he saw the continuum between panic and health anxiety, both involved, having misinterpretations of internal phenomena, specifically physical sensation. So we replicated the study. And so I saw people for whom their primary issue was having a catastrophic misinterpretation of physical sensations that were unexpected. And what we did was make them a bit more expected by doing panic inductions. I did panic inductions every week, with all the people I was seeing for the panic disorder study and really therapy started with the panic induction. Because that point we triggered it in-session the sensations, not really the panic attack because I was present there.

My mere presence and the fact that we did it, the fact it gave him a sense of control that there's something I did that triggered it meant that it wasn't unexpected. If you take the unexpected nature out of panic, it just doesn't have the same enthusiasm as it otherwise would have. Panic needs the element of surprise, surprise, surprise. There's no surprise that we're doing it. So as much as I did panic induction, they never really triggered panic, because we were doing something deliberately, took away the element of surprise. But what it did do, it gave them a chance to experience those very same sensations with a different interpretation of those sensations. It enabled them to have those sensations and realize and test it out that they weren't going to die.

They weren't going to lose control. They weren't going to faint for example, and that they could experience those sensations and flow through them.


Jennifer Ghahari:  Wow.

Norman Cotterell:  Yeah. So I got there when they were applying Beckian CBT for anxiety disorder. And then after that, we had a bipolar study in which people like Cory Newman and Mary Anne Layden and I think Susan Byers applied it to bipolar and borderline personality. They would book on that one. Cory wrote a book on bipolar and applying it to drug abuse. I worked in the project applying it to crack cocaine addiction. For a while we didn't see people with OCD, anybody with OCD we referred to Foa. She had a cognitive way of looking at it, but her procedure was very behavioral even though her conceptualization to my way of thinking was quite cognitive, but then we started seeing people with OCD. David M. Clark came up with a model for treating OCDs similar to Foa's but a tad more cognitive, I suppose, in perspective didn't necessarily involve that.

And didn't necessarily involve purely behavioral means, really Paul Salkovskis was one of the first people that I saw present on OCD, which is title of the talk was, “Why don't we all jump out of 10 story windows?” His point, being that for us, asking somebody with OCD to do
exposure and response prevention, is like asking somebody to leap out a 10 story window and expect to fly. Just like doing anything constructively with depression is a sign of strength and you got to honor that, doing anything constructively with anxiety is a sign of courage. You have to acknowledge their courage. For them to do anything towards exposure response prevention and I would regularly first off ask, "What are the disadvantages of doing exposure response prevention? What are the benefits of OCD?"

Someone had an affection for OCD. There's some person I regard as being an old friend. Old worst, best friend. When I saw a presentation from a person yesterday who likened OCD to being with a lumbering dog, that gets in the way of things. But you might have some degree of affection for that dog. And there's some people, not everybody, some people that I knew also despised OCD, but some people thought they might miss it and they... I heard one person say, "Just give me a social alcoholic, you'd be a social drinker. Don't want to give up drinking entirely. Can I be a social OCD person? I do just enough to take the edge off things, but not so much that it controls my life."

I look at the benefits of OCD and look at the cost of OCD and then the benefits of exposure response prevention, because sometimes people have some ambivalence about it and so you got lay those cards on the table. And that's capturing their beliefs about the process of therapy, because you got to acknowledge the courage and the product of therapy that they might miss an old friend if they regard OCD as being a little bit of an old friend, especially since they've had it since childhood, they wonder how life could exist without it. You got to expose those beliefs as well. So we saw people with OCD and then the final frontier, where Beck thought that CBT would not apply was with psychosis. But then Kingdon and Tarkington in the UK applied it to psychosis.

They had their model, normalizing delusions, normalizing hallucinations. We all got them, basically, and agreed upon hallucination, it's called reality. And delusions, one person's belief system, can be held as delusional by another. A Protestant might regard a Catholic’s belief in transubstantiation as being a fixed delusion. By saying, "Okay, so every week you turn wine into blood and bread into flesh. Okay." And for me that was Sunday. I had 12 years Catholic education. So that was just the way that it was. But from the perspective of a Protestant, that would be a fixed delusion that Catholics have that they performed this miracle every Sunday and transubstantiation, but it does not interfere in our lives whatsoever.

And I think what they had was that people can have said beliefs and not have it interfere with their lives whatsoever. That's really the issue. And that got extended with the latest work, which Beck was working on two days before he passed away at the age of 100 and Paul Grant, Ellen Inverso, Aaron Brinen on recovery oriented cognitive therapy, CTR, which is... Really, what Beck was most enthused at in working with severe chronic mental illness, in inpatient settings, working within the milieu, working such that people can identify their aspirations and find ways to achieve and experience those aspirations, either in hospital or out of hospital.

And that's the latest. So I think he described it, every time he thought that there was a place where it'd not apply, he'd applied it to. Now granted, I saw people occasionally who were referred to me for cognitive therapy who were struggling with dementia; CBT does not cure dementia.


Jennifer Ghahari:  Right. Yeah.

Norman Cotterell:  That it does not. But I worked with their family members.

Jennifer Ghahari:  Nice.

Norman Cotterell:  I had experience in geriatrics prior to coming to the Center for Cognitive Therapy, I worked with Philadelphia Geriatric Center where I was actually working with sociologists. I interviewed people who were caregiving spouses with dementia as part of a sociology research project. I interviewed people who had put their parents, loved ones in nursing homes. And for a third study, I was starting to interview people who experienced the death of a loved one, a death study.

And I was snatched from that to work on my dissertation and then also to go to the Center for Cognitive Therapy. Yeah, so I wouldn't say that CBT is appropriate for somebody with dementia, but it certainly is appropriate for caregiver stress.


Jennifer Ghahari:  Definitely makes sense, yeah.

Norman Cotterell:  Although on the other hand, there may be people who are finding ways to use CBT for people with dementia. The wild thing is... Oh, I forget who was visiting us. I forget. He's a neuroscientist. (*Joseph E. LeDoux of NYU) You'll probably look him up. He has a rock band called the Amygdaloids. He's a rock musician and neuroscientist. He opened for Roseanne Cash, I think. But anyways, he's a neuroscientist primarily, rockstar by night and he was visiting us. And he was basically saying that the notion that memory is just hippocampus is not true.

He says there's memory in every single cell of the body. He says, "I could teach planaria how to do tricks. I could teach single celled creatures how to do tricks. It's not just in the hippocampus." And that was reiterated in work that was cited by Charles Duhigg's book on habits, showing that even people with dementia can learn new habits. So they’ll forget that they learned them, but they could still learn them through muscle memory.

Jennifer Ghahari:  Oh, okay.

Norman Cotterell:  Yeah. Or even just things that they don't forget. I remember there was one person I was interviewing and some stuff remains and maybe some stuff can also be taught, but they gave demonstration to people even with dementia being taught specific habits. So maybe the B of CBT might even find some for people's dementia. When I was interviewing a caregiving spouse one time, I thought he had the radio on because I heard music playing and music stopped and his wife came out obviously in dementia and she was playing piano purely for memory.

Jennifer Ghahari:  Oh, wow, okay.

Norman Cotterell:  And he said she's been playing piano since she was five years old. Everything else was gone that remained, the muscle memory remained intact and it gave her great pleasure. In fact, there was a Ted Talk about a woman whose preparation for dementia was to learn how to knit, because she had observed that there were people with dementia who had muscle memory for activities that gave him a great pleasure. Since it ran in her family, her method of preparing for dementia was to learn a skill, put it in muscle memory, so if per chance that she came with dementia, that she'd have a pleasure to engage in.

Jennifer Ghahari:  It was something that she can to create. It sounds like whether it's music or knitting or something…

Norman Cotterell:  Yeah. And that's assuming that the portion of the brain would not be the portion of the brain that enables her to knit because actually I interviewed another caregiving spouse, but in that case the first thing that went for that individual was her painting ability, everything else... So it depends which part of the brain is being affected by the dementia as far as whether or not you maintain or lose specific capabilities. But with the cases of the woman with piano… that remained intact.

So maybe the B of the CBT might be a frontier for even working with dementia. But Tim Beck said the anytime he thought that CBT would not apply to a certain area, some expert, some person who knows that backwards and forwards would find a way. There were people who were expert in autism, spectrum conditions who found a way to adapt CBT to work with people on the spectrum.

Jennifer Ghahari:  Oh!

Norman Cotterell:  Okay. That's it. There are people who specialize in addictions who found a way to adapt CBT to work with addictions. So what happens is you get people and it might be more matter of the individual rather than the techniques. Find people who work well with that population, and they may find a way. They find a way to adapt the tools from CBT into the modality they work in. So we'll see. Well actually, can you think of an area that CBT has not touched yet?

Jennifer Ghahari:  No, not at this point.

Norman Cotterell:  Yeah. It'll probably come to us after the interview.

Jennifer Ghahari:  Exactly.

Norman Cotterell:  Yeah. I'd say it's a matter of the personality of the therapist and their expertise in that particular area. Like I stay away from kids, I don't see kids under the age of 17. No, do not. But there are people who are really, really good with children. I saw one of my colleagues working with a three or four year old and I regarded that as being amazing, but that was his field of expertise. That was his comfort zone. That's what he knew as far as working with children. And he applied the tools and techniques and strategies that were geared and tailored for that population in CBT to work with children. But I say that has more to do with the characteristics of the therapist than anything else.

Jennifer Ghahari:  Right.

Norman Cotterell:  Yeah.

Jennifer Ghahari:  So when someone goes to a therapist for CBT, what can they typically expect to happen? I know you mentioned exposure ERP for example, as one method, but what else can someone expect?

Norman Cotterell:  Well, I think the first thing I do ask them about what they want to see happen from therapy. I mean, this is before I even do the diagnostic interview. Really the purpose is to give them tools, so they can be on the road to changing their life. So really I start off, the most important thing is goal setting, which is defining a direction they want their life to head into. A goal is like a terminal point, direction is like heading Northeast in the direction of health towards that direction you want to go in. And whether it's a small step or a large step, you're still heading in the right direction. So I asked him to get a sense of that. I asked them the old question from Alfred Adler.

He had the magic wand question. David Burns reframes it as a magic button question. They might regard a magic wand as being a tad in infantilizing. So now I use a magic button, that way they have control over pushing it. And so if they push that magic button and they're healed, depression is gone. You feel great about yourself. Feel great about your personal world. You feel great about your future, your energy, your motivation, your drive for life, your zest for life is back and full force. And on top of that, anxiety's not a problem. The current wisdom is that anxiety's not the problem, fear of anxiety is the problem. Well, your fear of anxiety is gone and anxiety is nothing but booster jets to get the job done. Anxiety goes from being a liability to being an asset. Anxiety goes from being a foe to being a friend, goes from being enemy troops to reinforcement and anxiety is just energy to get the job done.

You push that button. You feel great about yourself, your world, your future, your energy, your motivation is back in full force. Anxiety is just energy and whatever goals you have, they're there. If you push that button and you're totally healed, external circumstances are the same. Externals are the same, but you push that button you have a change internally. What would you do? What would change in your life? And write that down. And then I ask a second way, same question. You push that button. You feel great about yourself, your world, your future, energy, motivation back in full force. Anxiety is just energy to get the job done. What would you do in the next seven days? Next seven days what would you do?


Jennifer Ghahari:  Yeah.

Norman Cotterell:  Yeah. To make it more specific and sometimes might say, "Yeah, do the same thing." Well, more pep in your step, more glide in your stride." Yeah. Okay. Put that down. More energy in doing what you're already doing. Or some people might say, "Well, nothing would change. I'd just be doing the same thing I did before." And some people might say, "Well, everything would change. Everything would change." I want to know whether they say nothing would change, everything will change or somewhere in between. And then I ask it a third way. You push that button. You feel great about yourself, your world, your future energy is back and full force. Anxiety is an asset rather than a liability. What would you do for the rest of day, this afternoon, this evening, tomorrow morning, tomorrow afternoon, tomorrow night what would you do if you are totally, thoroughly and permanently healed?

And I write that down to get a sense of what their life would be like if they were not plagued with these symptoms. And then I also ask, just a matter to ask, what kind of hobbies and interest do you have? What kind of things do they enjoy? What things, give them pleasure in life? And again, aspect of what interest they have, what things they would do. What interests they have had in the past and might have in the future again, if depression or fear or anxiety were gone. And I asked them the old Steve Hayes question, "If you could be in a world of your own making what would you want your life be about? What is really, really important for you?" I want to get a sense of their values.

Now, when we first came to Penn, I got thrust in another study on values in 1989, where they just had two, sociotrophy, autonomy were the two values that you're looking at Penn back in 1989. It's been expanded since then, I mean, Russ Harris has a quick look at your values, which I think I have 63, which are a good deal more than two that we're looking at Penn. But there can be values or needs or desires based on sociotrophy connections with people or based on autonomy. Things that can be done more individually. Either way, I want to know what's really, really important to them. What is really, really key for them. Sometimes if they are students I ask if success was guaranteed and whatever you touched turned to gold - what would you do for a career? If that is an issue for them, if they still try to decide what they want to do with their lives. I think if success was absolutely guaranteed what would you do for a career or for a livelihood? If that's relevant.

That's where I start off. And then with that, we review the goals in the first session, have them add detail to that. And I asked to tell also, what do you know about cognitive therapy? And how do you think it can help you with these issues to get you where you want to be or head in the direction you want to head? And then that's where we start in using the tools, in order to focus on the specific goals that they have in life, the direction they want to head towards in life and how we can take those initial steps in that direction. And sometimes it may be depression, which is telling them, "Forget about a kid, go to your cave, curl up in a fetal position." Depression telling them that they're a bear and it's time to hibernate. Or else the impediment could be fear of
anxiety, fear of anxious sensations, fear of anxious thoughts, fear of anxious urges that can get them stuck in which the cure, seemingly for anxiety it can be avoidance. For everything just avoid, but then they avoid everything.

And what happens, the byproduct of avoidance, it reduces anxiety temporarily if they avoid things that really, really matter. And then anxiety, the fear goes up. And then on top of that, if they get addicted to avoidance, it can trigger another side effect called depression. So we basically see what's getting in the way of them doing that. And so what they can expect is that I'll ask them what they want to put on the agenda or what they want to accomplish in session today. What's their goal for today's session.

And I ask them how the week went? I'm using the matter of course to capture people's aspects of the week. I'm taking from Marty Seligman on this one, on his PERMA mnemonic. Are you familiar with that one?

Jennifer Ghahari:  I'm not. No.

Norman Cotterell:  Yeah. It's his recipe or formula for well-being, if not happiness. First homework assignment, the first action plan I give people after the intake evaluation, after we look at the goals is... I define happiness like Oprah defines love: as behavior. It's what you do. Ok. So it can be what you do for pleasure. What you see, smell, taste, touch, hear that's pleasurable. What you do for others what other people do for you, what you enjoy vicariously that provides pleasure. And then I asked them, "What was the most enjoyable thing that you did in the past couple weeks? And what gave you pleasure?" For example, if I ask you, what was the most pleasurable thing you did in the past couple of weeks?

Jennifer Ghahari:  I actually traveled. I just got back from Europe and it was amazing.

Norman Cotterell:  Okay. So I write under pleasure: traveling. And then I say, there might be some things which might not create pleasure, but they engage your mind. They turn you on intellectually. So looking back in the past couple weeks, what interested you? What engaged your mind in the past couple weeks the most relatively speak?

Jennifer Ghahari:  It might sound funny, but the first thing that just popped into my head was decorating for Christmas.

Norman Cotterell:  Decorating for Christmas. Okay so for pleasure, it was travel, for engagement, decorate for Christmas, and there might be some things which might not create pleasure, they might not engage your mind, but they build relationships. The people you care about, the things that you do for love, either to give love, receive love, express love, anything that you did to build relations with people you care about in the past couple of weeks.

Jennifer Ghahari:  Actually both of those things, the traveling and decorating for Christmas, I think.

Norman Cotterell:  Yeah. Doing it for others, it could be service. And that could include words of affirmation, that could include gifts that you give to people. It could include just simple quality time you spend with people. It could include, physical touch and affection, could include acts of service. Anything like that can be those languages of love, which I just cited that people do to build relationships with people they care about and love. And then finally I say, or actually second to last, I say, there might be some things though that might not create pleasure. They might not engage your mind. They might not build relationships, but they give you a sense of meaning and purpose. And sometimes I go back to what do you want your life to be about for that one?

What do you want your life to be about for that one? And I ask, if there's anything that you did in the past week or two that gave you a sense of meaning and purpose? And sometimes it's a tough one for people. So it's really a matter of saying and identifying what they're already doing that gives them that sense of meaning and purpose. And that could be things they do for security and stability. If that's important to them, things they do for stimulation or adventure or variety in life, that's important for them. Things they do to build connections with people they care about, things they do to contribute to themselves. Things they do where they can experience, intellectual, spiritual, or growth or things that they do that provide them a sense of accomplishment or significance for that matter, feeling important, feeling valued in some ways.

Though that's a categorization of values or needs that I found in two places, one was with Cloe Madanes, she divides needs into those categories and found something similar in the works of Norman Epstein and Don Baucom in their couple's therapy book which also has lists of needs. Lists of needs, probably in those categories as well between, sociotropic needs, autonomous needs in those categories. But, it's a short step between needs and values. And Tim Beck didn't like the word needs, so he changed that word to desires. Because he said, "We’ll always need food and water." But these are more like desires than needs.

So Epstein and Baucom called them needs, I can call them the desires. If you don't like the word needs, it seems needy. So he said desires. So short step between desires and values. So we can go for that. And so that's what I capture what gives them a sense of meaning and purpose is what valued action they engage in. They're already engaging in. And so when you think about that in the past couple of weeks, what did you do in the past week or two that gave you a sense of meaning and purpose?

Jennifer Ghahari:  For me, I've been learning to cook a little bit healthier. And so I think that's... And sharing that with family and that I think gives me a little bit more meaning and purpose. And speaking with you as well for this series.

Norman Cotterell:  And according to that categorization provides a little spice as the variety of the spice of life. And so you add a little spice into your foods and it provides contribution because you're giving the food to others, the sense of contribution to them and it maybe even connection for that matter. And also if they complement your food, you can feel, "Oh God, that's great." And also growth in terms of your learning a new skill, learning a new ability. So it might capture a variety of desires or values that you might have. And so when I come to meaning, it's almost like having them discover what they're already doing, that they're already doing that satisfies those desires, what they're already doing that is in line with their deeper, deeper values.

And then finally back to Seligman, again, finally, there might be some things which might not create pleasure, they might not engage your mind. They might not build relationships, might not give you a sense of meaning and purpose, but they provide you a sense of accomplishment. And looking back over the past week or two, what gave you a sense of accomplishment?


Jennifer Ghahari:  Ooh, honestly, I made some really good recipes.

Norman Cotterell:  Okay. Okay. Yes.

Jennifer Ghahari:  They came out so much better than I expected.

Norman Cotterell:  Okay. So that's what I write down. For the first I say, "I write down for pleasure." Okay, let's say it can be travel, for engagement, it was learning how to cook, for relationship, the same thing. For meaning, being able to learn new things and for accomplishment, sharing the food with your family. Yeah, for meaning sharing the food with your family, learning new skills as far as what to cook and for accomplishment, the same thing. And then I asked them, at the end of the day, this is straight from Seligman as well, "at the end of the day write three things that went well." Things that you did that either provided pleasure or engaged your mind or built relationships with people you cared about or gave you a sense of meaning and purpose, or gave you a sense of accomplishment. Not three of each, please that would be 15. That's pleasure or engagement or relationships or meaning or accomplishment.

And together they spell the word PERMA, stands for pleasure, engagement, relationships, meaning, accomplishment. And that's the first thing I do. So before every session, I'm in the habit of asking, in the past week, what did you do for pleasure? What did you do that engaged your mind? What did you do for relationships? What did you do for meaning? What did you do for accomplishment?" And if they say, "I can't really think of it." That's fine, but be on the lookout. And oftentimes people might say “Nothing provided pleasure.” And if I think that's an important one, I ask, "Was there anything you saw? Come to your senses. Was there anything that you saw that gave you pleasure?"

Jennifer Ghahari:  Yeah.

Norman Cotterell:  "Anything that you heard that gave you pleasure. Anything you smelled." The most primitive sense, before we could do anything else, we could smell. Anything, you smell, any aromas, direct beeline to the brain. Any aromas that provided pleasure for you? Anything that you tasted that provided pleasure. Anything that you felt that provided... And usually when you come down to sensory experiences, even people who said, "Nothing was enjoyable. No pleasure whatsoever." When you break it down to the senses, nine times out of 10 they can pick out something that provided pleasure.

They could find something that provided that measure of pleasure for them. So that's what I lead off with. And then I ask, what do you want to work on problematically that you dealt with in week? Or look on the list of goals, which are these goals you want to work on first? And then just use the tools to do that. But I really start off with asking what went well, because our brains are really built to focus on what's wrong, not what's right.

We focus on what's wrong. It could eat us for lunch as if our lives depended upon that. And really what we do for growth perhaps is to update the software a little bit by having people focus on what's right. Not on the tile that is broken, but the tiles that are intact: the broken tile syndrome. We have a tendency to focus on that one tile that is broken to the exclusion all the ones that are intact. And so by doing that, I'm having them focus on the ones that are intact. That's John Kabat-Zinn’s notion that as long as you're breathing, there's something right with you. So focus on what's right, because we're really, really good at focusing what's wrong. And so just them giving equal time.

Jennifer Ghahari:  Fantastic. So as a therapist specializing in CBT, would you have any other advice or recommendations for our listeners? This is the last question I always like to end with.

Norman Cotterell:  Advice?

Jennifer Ghahari:  Any words of wisdom or…

Norman Cotterell:  Yeah, be nice, have fun. I mean, at this point I wasn't prepared for that because I'll probably say something that's going to be really, really, really trite like that. But sometimes trite things carry some weight for me. And I'll probably know exactly what it was. I'll probably email you, "This is what I should said." Words of wisdom!

Jennifer Ghahari:  (laughing) We’ll put a “Part Two.”

Norman Cotterell:  Well, I'm thinking of... I had an uncle who was born in the 1870s. He died of 1980s. He was a son of person who had been enslaved. And before I went to college, my uncle Willie said, "I got one word for you son, one word.” He said, “Strive. strive." So I think of my uncle Willie, as far as that word strive. But he had fun in the process, he had a lot of fun in the process of his long, long life. I mean, he lived way over 100 and went in long walks around Manhattan, read the New York Times every day and maintained that curiosity. So I think probably the other thing that I think that's really important is maintaining that spirit of curiosity. Maintain it.

Jennifer Ghahari:  As you said too, also just looking for the little positives in every day, whether it's a smell or if it's something more significant.

Norman Cotterell:  Yeah. And growth. My father's an amazing man. My father, he grew up with a drunken, gun toting, carousing gynecologist as a father. My grandfather immigrated this country with $7 in his pocket, worked construction when he was in divinity school, pastored a church when he was in medical school and later taught medical school at Meharry (Medical College). And then drank himself to death in 1941. My father was serving in World War II. So I regard the first Dr. Cotterell as being a cautionary tale, but his son, my father: amazing. My father barely graduated from high school, volunteered, was part of the CC camps where he built the national park system in the Pacific Northwest and Northern California and volunteered for the Navy and his first experience was Pearl Harbor. He survived that.

And I didn't find out about his heroics until after he had passed away about what he did there that he was cited for. But he hated the story told about African American soldiers being cowardly. So he made a point to put himself as many dangerous life-threatening situations as possible. He was in World War II. He was in Korea. He was a civil rights actor. He marched with Martin Luther King. Martin Luther King actually marched with him in Los Angeles with his group, Congress of Racial Equality. He was the firefighter where his job was to run into burning buildings. And my dad was a wild swimmer, take a raft in the middle of the Pacific Ocean and swim laps around it in the middle of the Pacific Ocean as well.

Amazing, amazing swimmer. I have none of his gifts in that area. And also built an addition to the house, single handedly, mad, mad, mad skills, mad skills. But at the age of 85, when he was no longer going to break any records, because he was the guy who would do twice as many pushups as guys for half his age when he was a firefighter. The one-arm’d push up, it would be my dad. And at the age of 85, he wasn't going to break any physical records, but yeah, he took piano lessons. And had a piano recital the age of 86.


Jennifer Ghahari:  Oh, that's amazing.

Norman Cotterell:  And so I think that is my role model really for maintaining curiosity and maintaining growth even into your 80s. And my other role model for that of course is Aaron Beck.

Yeah. Working and writing and maintaining that undying curiosity to the very, very end. Both he and my father were active, up until shortly, case of Aaron Beck two days before he passed away. Case of my father, like a month, maybe less, because my father went into the hospital thinking he would survive the surgery and got plane ticket. And this is at the age of 91, despite his best effort to lead a short and a rough life, he still lived to be 91. And at 91 he was thought to be fit enough to survive the surgery for a benign tumor. He wasn't. But he had plane tickets. He was going to have the surgery, hop on a plane, go to my niece's wedding at the age of 91, but he did not survive the surgery.

So he kept that spirit up until the end. So really when I think of my words of advice, I say seek inspiration from those people you admire the most. We all have people that we admire and they serve as role models. And we all have people who are more problematic. They're cautionary tales. And those might be people where we do the opposite of what they did. Whatever they did, the first Dr. Cotterell, he taught me about the importance of fidelity and sobriety. So that's just a good role model as far as what not to do in those areas.

And also nonviolence too. He was not exactly a peaceful guy. My father, on the other hand, absolutely a role model of what to do. So I'd say what I do is I find the people who I admire the most. I find the people who inspire me. And as much as possible I model all their actions, I learn from them. And I put into practice what they taught me. That's how I honor their memory by putting into practice what I learned from my uncle, Willie. Putting in practice, what I learned from my father and putting into practice, what I learned from Aaron Beck.

Jennifer Ghahari:  That's wonderful. Thank you so much. I'm probably going to watch this interview myself about 40 more times just because I feel like I got so much out of it personally, so I'm sure our listeners will also have an amazing time listening to it. Dr. Cotterell from the Beck Institute, thank you so much for spending this time with us.

Norman Cotterell:  It's certainly my pleasure.

Please note: The views expressed by the interviewee are for educational and informational purposes only, are not meant to diagnose or treat any condition, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Seattle Anxiety Specialists, PLLC.


Editor: Jennifer (Ghahari) Smith, Ph.D.