group therapy

To Diagnose or Not to Diagnose: The Debate on Personality Disorders in Adolescence

The Intersectionality of PD in Adolescence 

The presentation of a personality disorder in adolescence is complicated by the ongoing debate of whether personality disorders should be diagnosed. Some licensed health professionals are hesitant to provide a diagnosis due to the belief that adolescence is a period of changing personality,[1] thus, it is not appropriate to judge if a personality is disordered. However, other health professionals argue for the benefits of early detection and treatment, leading to better health outcomes.[2] The impacts of the home environment, genetics and consequences of a diagnosis further complicate this debate.

Effects of Home Environment 

Childhood maltreatment (e.g., neglect, physical abuse) substantially increases the risk of developing a personality disorder.[3] The Minnesota Project by Sroufe et al. (2005) followed a group of high-risk children into adulthood and found that insecure attachment during childhood is strongly associated with the later development of personality disorders in adolescence.[4] Later studies on Borderline Personality Disorders (BPD) further supported the association of adverse childhood experiences as a risk factor for personality disorders. Marchetti et al. (2022) found that a history of childhood maltreatment was associated with higher levels of BPD in adolescents (average age 16).[5] Furthermore, studies by Xiao et al. (2023) found that adolescents with BPD had higher rates of all the assessed childhood traumas when compared to adolescents with non-disordered personalities; this was especially true for emotional neglect (the most commonly seen childhood trauma).[6]

Effects of Biological Factors

Adolescence is a time of biological change, including those that regulate one’s personality. Throughout adolescence, the brain continues to develop in term of myelination and the formation of synaptic networks; thus, the neural basis for many psychological regulatory systems are still in development.[7] Furthermore, the frontal, temporal and occipital lobes of the brain (which are responsible for response inhibition, emotion regulation, planning and organization) are still developing during adolescence, which may account for the increased impulsivity sometimes seen during this period.[8] The increased levels of sex hormones adolescents are exposed to during puberty also affect mood regulation.[9] Therefore, the developmental changes of adolescence can bring forth impulsivity and mood changes, similar to the changes brought by a personality disorder. 

However, studies by Xiao et al. (2023) have found that there are also biological differences in adolescents with personality disorders compared to non-disordered peers.[10] They found that adolescents with Borderline Personality Disorder showed increased Amplitude Low-Frequency Fluctuations in the limbic system (a measure of spontaneous neuronal activity related to the mood swings associated with BPD).[11] Thus, biological factors can also account for differences in the mood swings of adolescents with disordered personalities compared to non-disordered adolescents.

Arguments in favor of a diagnosis

The argument in favor of a diagnosis appeals to the benefits of early diagnosis, specifically: better health outcomes. Paris et al. (2013) report that conditions such as antisocial personality disorders begin in childhood, and as a result of the early onset, psychopathology is more likely to continue.[12] An analysis of personality trait dimensions also supports the early establishment of personality. Studies by Shiner et al. (2009) suggest a continuity from child to adult personality based on findings that certain personality traits (e.g., openness, conscientiousness, extroversion, agreeableness, neuroticism) in childhood predicted later behaviors.[13] Klimstra et al. (2009) distinguish that personality traits change considerably at the ages of 10-15 years old and then stabilize at the ages of 16-21 years.[14] However, according to Cicchetti et al. (2009), since personality disorders (PD) do not begin in adulthood, early investigation is necessary to develop a lifespan model for treatment.[15] Schmeck (2022) further supports the need for early intervention in personality disorders, arguing that early diagnosis rids the stigma associated with PD and lessens the possibility of long-lasting impairments and disability by facilitating the transition into adulthood.[16] 

These benefits of early diagnosis may have been considered by the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) since the most recent version of the guide to diagnosing mental disorders has changed its age requirements for diagnosing PD. While earlier versions of the DSM did not allow someone under 18 to be diagnosed, the DSM-5 (the most recent version) allows the diagnosis of a personality disorder in someone under 18 if symptoms are present for at least one year.[17] 

Arguments against diagnosis

A study by Laurenssen et al. (2013) found that 57.8% of psychologists working with adolescents acknowledged the existence of personality disorders in this age group; however, only 8.7% of them actually made formal PD diagnoses in the adolescents.[18] The majority of psychologists are reluctant to diagnose adolescents based on the idea that personality is fluid and still developing.[19] Dijk et al. (2021) argue that while personality traits (e.g., openness, conscientiousness, extroversion, agreeableness, neuroticism) are structurally similar between adolescents and adults, there are developmental differences; for example, adolescents appear to be less conscientious.[20] Some psychologists also argue that an early diagnosis is stigmatizing since personality pathology can often be viewed as being unmodifiable.[21,22] Furthermore, according to Adshead et al. (2012), a misdiagnosis of a personality disorder in adolescence can focus attention away from interventions to improve the caregiving environment, particularly if neglect or abuse are present.[23] Perhaps taking the drawbacks of diagnosis into account, the American Psychiatric Association webpage, as of now, states that diagnosis of personality disorders is only applicable to individuals 18 and older (It is important to note that the American Psychiatric Association oversees the DSM-5).[24]

Treatment of PD in adolescence

Personality disorders vary in the ways they impact an individual’s thoughts and ways of expressing themselves, however, they align in their need for treatment to go away.[25] In adults certain psychotherapies (e.g., Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT), Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT), Group Therapy, Psychoanalytic) have shown to be effective for treating personality disorder.[26] If an adolescent is diagnosed with a personality disorder, their treatment plans may differ slightly from adults. Adolescent treatment plans are complex due to a current need for more evidence if adult interventions also work for adolescents.[27] Furthermore, these treatment plans are unique as they often incorporate the adolescent’s school and parents.[28]

If you believe you or your child may have a personality disorder, please reach out to a licensed mental health professional (e.g., a psychotherapist, psychologist or psychiatrist) for guidance and support.

Contributed by: Maria Karla Bermudez

Editor: Jennifer (Ghahari) Smith, Ph.D.

References

1 Adshead, G., Brodrick, P., Preston, J., & Deshpande, M. (2012). Personality disorder in adolescence. Advances in Psychiatric Treatment, 18(2), 109-118. doi:10.1192/apt.bp.110.008623

2 Cicchetti, D., & Crick, N. R. (2009). Precursors and diverse pathways to personality disorder in children and adolescents. Development and Psychopathology, 21(3), 683-685. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579409000388

3 Adshead et al. (2012)

4 Sroufe, A, Egeland, B, Carlson, E et al (2005) The Development of the Person: The Minnesota Study of Risk and Adaptation from Birth to Adulthood. Guilford Press

5 Marchetti, D., Musso, P., Verrocchio, M., Manna, G., Kopala-Sibley, D., De Berardis, D., . . . Falgares, G. (2022). Childhood maltreatment, personality vulnerability profiles, and borderline personality disorder symptoms in adolescents. Development and Psychopathology, 34(3), 1163-1176. doi:10.1017/S0954579420002151

6 Xiao, Q., Yi, X., Fu, Y., Jiang, F., Zhang, Z., Huang, Q., Han, Z., & Chen, B. T. (2023). Altered brain activity and childhood trauma in Chinese adolescents with borderline personality disorder. Journal of affective disorders, 323, 435–443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2022.12.003

7 Adshead et al. (2012)

8 Ibid. 

9 Ibid. 

10 Xiao et al. (2023)

11 Ibid. 

12 Paris, Joel. “Personality disorders begin in adolescence.” Journal of the Canadian Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry = Journal de l'Academie canadienne de psychiatrie de l'enfant et de l'adolescent vol. 22,3 (2013): 195-6. doi:10.1007/s00787-013-0389-7

13 Shiner, R (2009) The development of personality disorders: perspectives from normal development. Development and Psychopathology 4: 715–34

14 Klimstra, TA, Hale, WW, Raaijmoken, QA (2009) Maturation of personality in adolescence. Journal of Personality, Society & Psychology 96: 898–912

15 Cicchetti et al. (2009)

16 Schmeck, K. (2022, March 17). Debate: Should CAMHS professionals be diagnosing ... - wiley online library. ACAMH. https://acamh.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/camh.12553

17 Personality disorders: Diagnosis. CAMH. (n.d.). https://www.camh.ca/en/professionals/treating-conditions-and-disorders/personality-disorders/personality-disorders---diagnosis#:~:text=According%20to%20DSM%2D5%2C%20features,for%20at%20least%20one%20year.

18 Laurenssen, E. M., Hutsebaut, J., Feenstra, D. J., Van Busschbach, J. J., & Luyten, P. (2013). Diagnosis of personality disorders in adolescents: a study among psychologists. Child and adolescent psychiatry and mental health, 7(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/1753-2000-7-3

19 Paris (2013)

20 van Dijk, I., Krueger, R. F., & Laceulle, O. M. (2021). DSM-5 alternative personality disorder model traits as extreme variants of five-factor model traits in adolescents. Personality disorders, 12(1), 59–69. https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000409

21 Cicchetti et al. (2009)

22 Adshead et al. (2012)

23 Ibid. 

24 What are personality disorders?. Psychiatry.org - What are Personality Disorders? (2022, September). https://www.psychiatry.org/patients-families/personality-disorders/what-are-personality-disorders#:~:text=Diagnosis%20of%20a%20personality%20disorder,their%20personalities%20are%20still%20developing.

25 Ibid.

26 Ibid.

27 Adshead et al. (2012)

28 Ibid.

Demystifying Group Therapy

Image Source: Shutterstock

What is Group Therapy?

The origins of the group therapy we know today began in the early twentieth century when it was used to support Tuberculosis patients in the hospital setting and later to support WWII soldiers (Barlow et al., 2004). Since then group therapy has undergone many changes, theoretical modalities have been created, and researchers have studied its effectiveness. Group therapy relies on the restorative power of relationships developed in a dedicated and supportive community. Joining a group provides a dedicated space for growth alongside a group of individuals who are committed to uplifting one another through the process.

What happens in a group session?

Groups can be focused on a theme, diagnosis, or lived experience (to name a few), and group members will gravitate towards themes that resonate with their goals and needs. For some, this may be the first time they have been in a community space with people who can uniquely understand part of their lived experience.

Group therapy allows for connection over common ground, whether that is the commitment to personal growth or a history of a particular diagnosis. The diversity of the group provides a wealth of unique perspectives.

Group therapy leverages the interpersonal dynamics present in the session as a vehicle for growth, and these dynamics can also shed light on specific behaviors that may not play out in individual therapy. As these dynamics unfold, they can be re-written in the here-and-now with the support of other members and the facilitator(s).

Please know that this is a high-level view of groups, and each group's content and flow will depend on the facilitators' style and modality. However, most sessions will begin and end with a check-in/out, and the rest of the session will focus on the primary theme, skill, activity, and/or a certain amount of processing.

The facilitator, a therapist, plays a pivotal role in the progression of the therapeutic aspects of group therapy. As noted above, the group leverages interpersonal dynamics and community as vehicles for growth. This process is supported by the therapist, who creates a space for these forces to unfold. Additionally, the facilitator provides feedback, supports insight development amongst members, and aids in conflict resolution as it arises.

The Seattle Psychiatrist Interview Series will be interviewing thought leaders in the group therapy space over the next few months, so please check back to hear from group therapists bringing creativity, research, and evidence-based practice to the therapeutic space.

Image Source: Shutterstock

Is Group Therapy for Me?

Individual therapy and group therapy have their unique place in helping you achieve your personal growth goals. One of the core elements of group therapy is the community element and the focus on group dynamics as a medium for growth. Group therapy may happen in parallel to individual treatment.

Depending on group content, facilitators may have certain exclusionary criteria or requirements (e.g., suicidal ideation). Contact the facilitator if you are unsure if you qualify for a group or if the group context will appropriately meet your needs.

Reflection questions as you consider group therapy:

  1. What goals do I have for group therapy?

  2. What is prompting me to explore this now?

  3. What is my previous experience with group experiences (activities, therapy, etc.), and how may that have an impact on how I show up in the group?

  4. What concerns about the process do I have that may have an impact on how fully I show up and the extent to which I commit to the experience?

  5. In what environment do I learn best?

Getting the most out of a group requires a commitment to the process, a willingness to be open and present, and an interest in learning from others.

Group effectiveness 

Group therapy is equally effective as individual therapy in treating a wide variety of clinical concerns. In fact, in a research study comparing the two modalities, the authors concluded that there was a "significant reduction in both depression and anxiety scores... with no significant difference between group and individual therapy outcomes" (Fawcet et. al, 2019, p. 430).

Furthermore, they challenged the notion that individual therapy is the primary medium through which intense change can occur and stated, "group therapy need not be viewed as a 'step down' from individual therapy, but that it can be just as intensive of an intervention as individual therapy" (Fawcet et. al, 2019, p. 436).

Irvin Yalom, one of the primary thought leaders and researchers in group therapy, studied the factors which contribute to group effectiveness and identified a “construct of the curative process in group psychotherapy” (Butler & Fuhriman, 1983, p.131). Through decades of research on group therapy, "the triad of self-understanding, catharsis, and interpersonal learning (input) [are shown] as the most highly valued factors in outpatient therapy groups" (Butler & Fuhriman, 1983, p.140).

Image Source: The Theory and Practice of Group Psychotherapy, Yalom (1995): PositivePsychology.com

6 tips to get the most out of group:

  1. Intention: Set a clear intention for your group experience

  2. Fit: Identify a group that fits your needs (seek out an individual therapist and discuss with the group leader for additional support)

  3. Relationships: Invest in the interpersonal relationship and respect each person's unique perspective and process

  4. Growth: Utilize a growth mindset by conceptualizing tension as an opportunity for progress 

  5. Commitment: Commit to the experience and embrace the process

  6. Openness: lead with curiosity and presence 

Additional Resources

Here are a few resources to explore as you continue to learn more about group therapy and identify the best fit:

If you’re ever interested in joining a group, you can always reach out to the facilitator and inquire if you have specific questions about the content and/or structure of their group - or to ask if they have any further resources you can use in your journey.

If you would like to learn more about participating in an upcoming group at Seattle Anxiety Specialists, PLLC, please reach out to info@seattleanxiety.com or check here for more information.

Contributed by: Sonya Jendoubi, MS., LMHC

Editor: Jennifer (Ghahari) Smith, Ph.D.

References

1 Barlow, S. H., Fuhriman, A. J., & Burlingame, G. M. (2004). The History of Group Counseling and Psychotherapy. In J. L. DeLucia-Waack, D. A. Gerrity, C. R. Kalodner, & M. T. Riva (Eds.), Handbook of group counseling and psychotherapy (pp. 3–22). Sage Publications Ltd.

2 Fawcett, E., Neary, M., Ginsburg, R., & Cornish, P. (2019). Comparing the effectiveness of individual and group therapy for students with symptoms of anxiety and depression: A randomized pilot study. Journal of American College Health, 68(4), 430–437. https://doi.org/10.1080/07448481.2019.1577862

3 Butler, T., & Fuhriman, A. (1983). Curative factors in group therapy. Small Group Behavior, 14(2), 131–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/104649648301400201